Recently, I have been thinking a lot about my role as a writer particularly when it comes to commentary and op-ed writing. I am always asking myself if my writing is part of a solution, or part of the problem – the “problem” being a society in which everyone has something to say, but few offer or provide solutions to address the issues that they talk/debate/complain about. The latter you see is much harder than the former.
We currently live in a commentator culture, in which everyone not only has an opinion but has a channel through which to express that opinion. We are all experts and enjoy our armchair theorizing on what everyone – from heads of state to a Z list celebrity – is doing.
I have spent many column inches and airtime talking about the shoulda, woulda and the couldas of life. And don’t get me wrong – I enjoy it! But I also ask myself how much of a difference it makes. As someone committed to making a tangible difference in the world, I’m becoming much more interested in, and committed to, work that provides solutions to an issue and is forward thinking.
My focus from here on is on solutions-orientated work. There is conversation that sparks discussion, and that has its merits. I am also concerned, however, about what happens to the very issue that we are discussing and debating about. For while we are talking about it, it still continues. If nothing changes to the issue, what difference has debating made?
So from here on, you’ll be noticing a different tone and approach to my writing and indeed any other work that I am engaged in. I hope you continue to enjoy reading!
It is refreshing to see that you are thinking about writing in solutions in your work; that is very Paul Robeson of you.
Good Luck!
Hi Lola.
“But I also ask myself how much of a difference it makes.” You don’t always see the difference you make.
Lola:
Yes, you make a difference. It’s difference in the very best sense: You voice concerns that many of us cannot or do not because we’re under siege. You validate those concerns and so give ordinary readers access to language that makes activism possible. You consider the weight of your opinion carefully, and admit the possibility that fairness is attainable. All of this makes you an agent of change, not passivity, in terms of influence.
Many people in America seem not to distinguish between tone and analytical thought: Supposed phoniness, weakness or insincerity becomes the focus rather than testing actual ideas. Writing as you do, I believe you help to give analytical tools to readers who might not have had access otherwise.
Further activism on your part can only be a good thing, but your thoughtful columns are also important. In the media, here and elsewhere, your critical tools and perspective are in rather short supply.
just keep…moving…forward